PDA

View Full Version : Impeachment?



RedRose
March 31st, 2006, 08:52 PM
Hi all,

Think Bush will be impeached? USA media is NOT reporting on this issue. How do Bush's transits look?

RedRose

National Impeachment Movement Ignored by Corportate Media


By Peter Phillips

If a national movement calling for the impeachment of the President is rapidly emerging and the corporate media are not covering it, is there really a national movement for the impeachment of the President?

Impeachment advocates are widely mobilizing in the U.S. Over 1,000 letters to the editors of major newspapers have been printed in the past six months asking for impeachment. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette letter writer George Matus says, “I am still enraged over unasked questions about exit polls, touch-screen voting, Iraq, the cost of the new Medicare…who formulated our energy policy, Jack Abramoff, the Downing Street Memos, and impeachment.” David Anderson in McMinnville, Oregon pens to the Oregonian, “Where are the members of our congressional delegation now in demanding the current president’s actions be investigated to see if impeachment or censure are appropriate actions?” William Dwyer’s letter in the Charleston Gazette says, “Congress will never have the courage to start the impeachment process without a groundswell of outrage from the people.”

City councils, boards of supervisors, and local and state level Democrat central committees have voted for impeachment. Arcata, California voted for impeachment on January 6. The City and County of San Francisco, voted Yes on February 28. The Sonoma County Democrat Central Committee (CA) voted for Impeachment on March 16. The townships of Newfane, Brookfield, Dummerston, Marlboro and Putney in Vermont all voted for impeachment the first week of March. The New Mexico State Democrat party convention rallied on March 18 for the ”impeachment of George Bush and his lawful removal from office.” The national Green Party called for impeachment on January 3. Op-ed writers at the St. Petersburg Times, Newsday, Yale Daily News, Barrons, Detroit Free Press, and the Boston Globe have called for impeachment. The San Francisco Bay Guardian (1/25/06) The Nation (1/30/06) and Harpers (3/06) published cover articles calling for impeachment. As of March 16, thirty-two US House of Representatives have signed on as co-sponsors to House Resolution 635, which would create a Select Committee to look into the grounds for recommending President Bush’s impeachment.

Polls show that nearly a majority of Americans favor impeachment. In October of 2005, Public Affairs Research found that 50% of Americans said that President Bush should be impeached if he lied about the war in Iraq. A Zogby International poll from early November 2005 found that 53% of Americans say, "If President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment." A March 16, 2006 poll by American Research Group showed that 42% of Americans favored impeaching Bush.

Despite all this advocacy and sentiment for impeachment, corporate media have yet to cover this emerging mass movement. The Bangor Daily News simply reported on March 17 that former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark has set up the website Votetoimpeach.org and that other groups are using the internet to push impeachment. The Wall Street Journal, on March 16, editorialized about how it is just “the loony left” seeking impeachment, but perhaps some Democrats in Congress will join in feeding on the “bile of the censure/impeachment brigades.”

The corporate media are ignoring the broadening call for impeachment — wishing perhaps it will just go away. Television news and talk shows have mentioned impeachment over 100 times in the past 30 days, mostly however in the context of Senator Russ Feingold’s censure bill and the lack of broad Democrat support for censure or impeachment. Nothing on television news gives the impression that millions of Americans are calling for the impeachment of Bush and his cohorts.

The Bush Administration lied about Iraq, illegally spied on US citizens, and continues war crimes in the Middle East. Despite corporate media’s inability to hear the demands for impeachment, the groundswell of outrage continues to expand.



Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored a media research organization. Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney by Dennis Loo and Peter Phillips is scheduled for release this summer by Seven Stories Press

mercuric
April 3rd, 2006, 01:02 AM
in the near future, the month of may certainly seems like big stuff for him. on the 5th of may the jupiter/neptune trine aspects his sun most closely (both planets at 8 arcmin of orb at 5am GMT), with thier midpoint opposing his sun.

uranus is sudden changes, jupiter represents the "king" (or highest leader) of a nation. if i was in his shoes, i'd be a little uptite about this one.

especially considering mars and juno beseige his sun at that time. if that's not worrysome enough, pluto forms a 5 arcmin inconjuct to his saturn. the saturn/pluto cycle is nothing to disregard!

at that time, there is also a 2arcmin biquitile from neptune to his sun.

obviously, this can play out in a number of ways, but it sure seems 5 objects impacting his sun, which happens to be his ascendant ruler, is nothing he will escape feeling.

since his sun is at nearly the same location as the usa's national sun, these energies will effect the whole nation.

the may 5th timeframe also brings important aspects to various major national charts. see my post in the 2006 planetary patterns thread for more on this.

mercuric
April 14th, 2006, 03:36 AM
i wonder how this will play out. hehe.

april 24, bush's lunar nodes get tag-teamed by a number of planets...

it seems pretty significant the midpoint of the exact sun/saturn square is within 10 arcmin of his north node. not exactly something that happens often!

the gray colored aspects from mercury are 16th harmonic aspects (based on 22.5 degrees, these being 67.5/112.5) and are used in uranian astrology. they function much like regular squares, except the orbs are much tighter and the effects more subliminal/unwillful. they are exact.

saturn is in leo, the sun's sign, and the sun is transiting in bush's saturn-natural 10th house. saturn is also only 2 degrees from bush's ascendant at this point.

also interesting, but not pictured, is the 6 arcmin inconjunct from t.pluto to his natal saturn.

also, mars transits the usa's natal jupiter (1776 chart) this same day. using the march 1789 (constituiton) chart, t.uranus conjuncts saturn and t.pluto septiles itself, all aspects within a few arcmin.

ILOVEAUTUMNS
April 14th, 2006, 03:59 AM
I heard a funny on the radio

all he needs to do to get impeached is bang conalezza rice...

hope that made someone laugh :)