Snapdragon
June 17th, 2007, 03:39 PM
What the initial posts show, I think, is that 'Dianic' is a term that might do with a bit of discussion and definition; it might not mean exactly the same thing to everyone.
For myself, I am drawn here because all my devotional energy goes to the sacred feminine--specifically, Kali. As a Wiccan, I acknowledge the twining of creative Difference at the foundation of Being, but don't feel a need to specifically name these as Goddess and God. This finesses the very real problem of heterosexist bias in the Craft, and any potential affront to transgendered people. Though it might appear to be, this really isn't an ideological response, but a feeling one. What first drew me to the Craft was the beauty of the imagery (visual and written) and the primacy of the sacred feminine.
I want to say a bit about this last point. There was a very thoughtful piece in a recent article at Witchvox by a lady who felt the God was being neglected, possibly creating a sense of inequality within the Craft. I sent her a polite reply, suggesting that the actual, existing imbalance across the world is drastically weighted against the feminine. What appears to be imbalance is actually a beginning to right the dangerous tipping ark on which we all travel. In almost every conceivable way, women get the sharp end of the stick. Thus, a sole focus on Her is neither exclusionary nor unbalanced: it is simply the way we are called to Her worship, and this requires no justification.
Finally, I think Dianic Wicca is an expression and repository of the feminine as engendered energy, and is therefore fully accessible to female, male, and transgendered people.
I hope this thread proves useful.
For myself, I am drawn here because all my devotional energy goes to the sacred feminine--specifically, Kali. As a Wiccan, I acknowledge the twining of creative Difference at the foundation of Being, but don't feel a need to specifically name these as Goddess and God. This finesses the very real problem of heterosexist bias in the Craft, and any potential affront to transgendered people. Though it might appear to be, this really isn't an ideological response, but a feeling one. What first drew me to the Craft was the beauty of the imagery (visual and written) and the primacy of the sacred feminine.
I want to say a bit about this last point. There was a very thoughtful piece in a recent article at Witchvox by a lady who felt the God was being neglected, possibly creating a sense of inequality within the Craft. I sent her a polite reply, suggesting that the actual, existing imbalance across the world is drastically weighted against the feminine. What appears to be imbalance is actually a beginning to right the dangerous tipping ark on which we all travel. In almost every conceivable way, women get the sharp end of the stick. Thus, a sole focus on Her is neither exclusionary nor unbalanced: it is simply the way we are called to Her worship, and this requires no justification.
Finally, I think Dianic Wicca is an expression and repository of the feminine as engendered energy, and is therefore fully accessible to female, male, and transgendered people.
I hope this thread proves useful.