cydira
April 21st, 2001, 11:23 PM
First, however, I need to admit something. I'm addicted to smilies!! :D
Now that I have that out of my system... ;)
I wanted to toss a few ideas out to you folks and find out how you felt about them.
I've been attempting to learn about magic for a few years now. I've come to several basic assumptions about this and a few other related items that I'd like to share with you. This way I can learn how others in my community view magic and their perspective.
My first assumption is that magic is another form of science. Magic is not supernatural because it exists in this world. The word supernatural means above nature or beyond nature, and because magic is natural ... well you get the point with that little side trip. :D But science is the study of the fundamental laws of nature and the processes by which nature operates. There are different branches of science that specialize in different areas and I belive that magic is a specialization in the area of spirit and energy. :)
My second assumption is that magic is "undiscovered" science. Because magic can not be explained by quantized formulas and the seemingly arcane explinations of "traditional" science, it is not accepted by the majority of the scientific community. They agree that there is a possiblity that something such as prayer can influence something, but the can not agree on the complex workings of it.
My third assumption is that magic is the manipulation of the body's energy field (aura) and it's interatction with other energy fields (ie: the aura's of plants, other people, or the greater energy of the universe). This manipulation will function in many respects like a wave sent out. Initially it may be a very limited wave but as it moves it will build in strength untill it brings manifest the objective of the magical working.
My fourth assumption is that magic can be negated by three things: 1.) an equal "energy wave" disrupting it (ie: a counterspell or a grounding of the energy); 2.) a weak focus = a weak wave, not enough conviction to move the energy; 3.) extended disruption of the wave by the environment (ie: a spell running it's course and no other effects would be noted).
And last, my fifth assumption is that any tools serve as a mental focus and psychological trigger to assist the mind in entering a state that allows the manipulation of the energy field of the body or about the body.
What do y'all think?
Now that I have that out of my system... ;)
I wanted to toss a few ideas out to you folks and find out how you felt about them.
I've been attempting to learn about magic for a few years now. I've come to several basic assumptions about this and a few other related items that I'd like to share with you. This way I can learn how others in my community view magic and their perspective.
My first assumption is that magic is another form of science. Magic is not supernatural because it exists in this world. The word supernatural means above nature or beyond nature, and because magic is natural ... well you get the point with that little side trip. :D But science is the study of the fundamental laws of nature and the processes by which nature operates. There are different branches of science that specialize in different areas and I belive that magic is a specialization in the area of spirit and energy. :)
My second assumption is that magic is "undiscovered" science. Because magic can not be explained by quantized formulas and the seemingly arcane explinations of "traditional" science, it is not accepted by the majority of the scientific community. They agree that there is a possiblity that something such as prayer can influence something, but the can not agree on the complex workings of it.
My third assumption is that magic is the manipulation of the body's energy field (aura) and it's interatction with other energy fields (ie: the aura's of plants, other people, or the greater energy of the universe). This manipulation will function in many respects like a wave sent out. Initially it may be a very limited wave but as it moves it will build in strength untill it brings manifest the objective of the magical working.
My fourth assumption is that magic can be negated by three things: 1.) an equal "energy wave" disrupting it (ie: a counterspell or a grounding of the energy); 2.) a weak focus = a weak wave, not enough conviction to move the energy; 3.) extended disruption of the wave by the environment (ie: a spell running it's course and no other effects would be noted).
And last, my fifth assumption is that any tools serve as a mental focus and psychological trigger to assist the mind in entering a state that allows the manipulation of the energy field of the body or about the body.
What do y'all think?