AmericanMe
November 27th, 2004, 05:30 AM
I don't know how old this article (http://www.beliefnet.com/story/155/story_15517_1.html) is or if it's even something new to MW, but it brings up some interesting ideas, especially on the last page:
Dagonet Dewr is executive director of Pagan Pride Day and executive editor of newWitch magazine. He says Wicca doesn’t need an institution to enforce Wiccan orthodoxy because “there ain’t no such bird.” But it does need an organization that would hold accountable its clergy--many of whom are self-declared or recognized as such by their own small band of followers
“We need an institutional model that hasn’t been designed before,” he said. “One that doesn’t include dogma but does include accountability, responsibility and a way to interface with the public.”
Looking for opinions, does Wicca need this?
In my humble yet outspoken opinion Wiccans aren't going to elect a 'pope' anytime soon, but face it, there's alot of books and 'witch kits' published out there that are questionable at best, and I believe it cheapens the religion in a way.
Dagonet Dewr is executive director of Pagan Pride Day and executive editor of newWitch magazine. He says Wicca doesn’t need an institution to enforce Wiccan orthodoxy because “there ain’t no such bird.” But it does need an organization that would hold accountable its clergy--many of whom are self-declared or recognized as such by their own small band of followers
“We need an institutional model that hasn’t been designed before,” he said. “One that doesn’t include dogma but does include accountability, responsibility and a way to interface with the public.”
Looking for opinions, does Wicca need this?
In my humble yet outspoken opinion Wiccans aren't going to elect a 'pope' anytime soon, but face it, there's alot of books and 'witch kits' published out there that are questionable at best, and I believe it cheapens the religion in a way.