Daily Horoscopes | Wii Store | Online Advertising | Magazine Subscriptions | Watch anime

Acceptable and unacceptable chart interpretations [Archive] - MysticWicks Online Pagan Community and Spiritual Sanctuary

PDA

View Full Version : Acceptable and unacceptable chart interpretations


Fluffmeister
March 9th, 2005, 05:45 PM
I'm a little puzzled about the guidelines in this forum. I've done quite a few interpretations for people in here, as have several other astrologers - and from time to time we've discussed the charts of famous people too.

However, I see a post made by a friend of mine who is a long-time MW contributor, who specialises in mundane astrology, was pulled (it still shows up in the forum, but is marked as "moved" and isn't accessible) without the poster being given any explanation as to what the problem was.

The post, which I've seen in full, didn't seem to be at all controversial - he simply looked at aspects and stellar parans in the chart of a senior military commander, whose date of birth was the same as my friend's. He then compared the two charts to show how the same aspects can play out in different ways - his own chart being that of an astrologer, the other chart being of someone who is in a position of power.

Now, I know that forums take different approaches to chart interpretation - I moderate an astrology forum which discourages giving interpretations (in fact, we usually point people in the direction of Mystic Wicks if they ask for a reading). I'd always assumed MW was OK about giving readings, and also about looking at charts of famous figures - but perhaps giving specific examples and advice is seen as being unhelpful and is contrary to MW policy (this is certainly the case on the forum I moderate, so I appreciate the stance).

So could a moderator please clarify what the guidelines are for giving interpretations and analysing personal and public charts in MW? If giving interpretations for individuals or public figures isn't acceptable, then obviously I'll stop doing so and of course stop advising other people to ask for interpretations here - but there's nothing in the FAQ about this, so I had assumed this was OK.

Obviously, if this isn't acceptable and the mods would prefer that astrology discussions be kept general rather than specific, then I'll abide by that - but it would be useful to have a sticky explaining this somewhere.

I hope someone can clarify what the guidelines are - in the meantime, I'll refrain from giving specific advice and interpretations and apologise if I've been treading on toes by doing so.

skonsa
March 9th, 2005, 07:05 PM
Hi.

I was the one who reported his post. I did so because of the personal information he revealed about the military commander in question. I mean there was information about where he lived, worked, his wife and the number of children they had. Not to mention the picture.

I think it's wrong to post such information about people without their consent. Not to speak of doing so under the pretense that the person specified might be the "antichrist" or the likes. I also find it especially distasteful to publish personal information about a non-public persona whilst witholding your own name! I choose to use the phrase non-public because even though the man in question had been an astronaut many years ago I don't think that justifies his private information being publicized without his knowledge or consent.

To everyone concerned, I apologize sincerely for any hurt or upset I have caused. I'm new here and I didn't mean to cause any trouble and certainly not to disrepute anyone. I hope that you will accept my apology and not blame the moderators, I accept full responsibilty for my words and actions and will stand by them.

Fluffmeister, in hope that it will end the matter I will abstain from commenting on this forum. I am utterly dismayed that you have taken this to heart, I respect you and I am grateful to you for the help and advice you have given me.

Peace
Skonsa (a besserwisser with ego-maniacal tendencies and a former self-appointed vigilante of the astrology forum.....for better or worse)

Valkie
March 9th, 2005, 08:20 PM
????

I must've missed the original post.

As far as I know, there are no set 'rules' to the astrology forum. If there was an issue with personal information being devulged without the person's conscent as skonsa states there was, I can see why the post was moved/edited. Anominity should be at the top of the list when discussing a 3rd person's chart on the net.

KEishin
March 9th, 2005, 09:22 PM
I didn't read the post, but I would just be careful when discussing others without their permission.

If the chart is in the public domain, then sure I see no issues. Many sites do a "who has the same xxx as you" section for astrology.

knickers
March 10th, 2005, 03:34 AM
ok not wanting to jump on the bandwagon, but i'm gonna LOL

Instead of deleting it, why didnt the Mod in question just 'XXXXXX' the details out? leave the post there, PM the poster (about the concern of the post), and allow them the chance to edit it?

Therefore leaving the general gist of the post there for people to see but taking out the personal details. The original poster then would have been given the opportunity of editing to rectify the matter, which didnt seem to happen in this case?

Maybe I'm oversimplfying here but 'meh'

Fluffmeister
March 10th, 2005, 06:16 AM
The person in question was not a "non-public" persona - he's a former astronaut and the "personal" information about him all came from a public website about astronauts. I didn't see any reference to the anti-Christ (though I saw a screen shot of the post, not the original post itself), just a reference that a Grand Quintile forms a pentagon, which is appropriate for someone working at the Pentagon!

I'm not criticising you, Skonsa - if you feel a post is inappropriate, especially if you felt the person was not a public person - then it's quite right to report a post. My concern is that the person who made the post (he's a long-time poster here and a friend of mine) made it in good faith, and has no idea why the post has been pulled. I'd assumed that perhaps discussing the charts of public figures was a no-no, although we've certainly had discussions on the charts of Bush, Blair and so on in the past without any problems.

I would say to the moderators, however, that if you do deem it necessary to pull a post, it would be a courtesy to let the poster know why the post has been pulled. If any of us do breach rules without actually knowing what they are, it's pretty frustrating!

Xentor
March 11th, 2005, 07:24 AM
Responsible admin here.

The thread was pulled because I wanted to privately discuss it with the other admins. We have come to the conclusion that it is no problem to create such threads and discuss such topics.

My apologies for not informing the original poster, Monk. The thread will be re-inserted into the forums.

http://www.mysticwicks.com/showthread.php?t=87721

Fluffmeister
March 11th, 2005, 07:30 AM
Responsible admin here.

The thread was pulled because I wanted to privately discuss it with the other admins. We have come to the conclusion that it is no problem to create such threads and discuss such topics.

My apologies for not informing the original poster, Monk. The thread will be re-inserted into the forums.

http://www.mysticwicks.com/showthread.php?t=87721
Many thanks for the clarification, Xentor - it's appreciated.

Kaylara
March 11th, 2005, 10:04 AM
Sorry Fluffmeister! I sent the pm before I looked here! LMAO. So apparently it has been taken care of ;)