PDA

View Full Version : I want in on THIS!!!



Danustouch
October 23rd, 2001, 02:29 PM
1. January 2000: Kathleen Robertson of Austin Texas was awarded $780,000 by
a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was
running amuck inside a furniture store. The owners of the store were
understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the misbehaving tyke
was Ms. Robertson's son.

2. June 1998: A 19 year old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 and
medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord.
Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice someone was at the wheel of the car
whose hubcap he was trying to steal.

3. October 1998: A Terrence Dickson of Bristol Pennsylvania was exiting
a house he finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not able to get
the garage door to go up, because the automatic door opener was
malfunctioning.

He couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the house and
garage locked when he pulled it shut. The family was on vacation, so Mr.
Dickson found himself locked in the garage for eight days. He subsisted on a
case of Pepsi he found, and a large bag of dry dog food. This upset Mr.
Dickson, so he sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused
him undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of half a million
dollars and change.

4. October 1999: Jerry Williams of Little Rock Arkansas was awarded
$14,500
and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door
neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in it's owner's fenced-in yard,
as was Mr Williams. The award was less than sought after because the jury
felt the dog may have been provoked by Mr. Williams who, at the time, was
shooting it repeatedly with a pellet gun.

5. May 2000: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson
of Lancaster, Pennsylvania $113,500.00 after she slipped on a spilled soft
drink and broke her tail bone. The beverage was on the floor because Ms.
Carson threw it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

6. December 1997: Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware successfully sued
the owner of a night club in a neighboring city when she fell from
thebathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This
occurred while Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the
ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded
$12,000.00 and dental expenses.

7. And just so you know that cooler heads do occasionally prevail
Kenmore Inc., the makers of Dorothy Johnson's microwave, were found not
liable for the death of Mrs. Johnson's poodle after she gave it a bath and
attempted to dry it by putting the poor creature in her microwave for, "just
a few minutes, on low." The case was quickly dismissed.

Socharis
October 23rd, 2001, 02:31 PM
LOL 8O cheers i needed that

Swanspirit
October 23rd, 2001, 02:40 PM
( not trying to rain on your parade but)when I think that people like this are the reason insurance costs are so high....... somhow I just cant laugh....... sighhhhh......
Love and Light
Swannie

Radocs
October 23rd, 2001, 02:42 PM
That's funny and appalling at the same time... :lol: :ugh:

Kaylara
October 23rd, 2001, 02:45 PM
I agree Swannie. If you are in the process of a commiting a crime, and you are injured by your victim, then you should not be able to sue.

Kaylara

Swanspirit
October 23rd, 2001, 02:49 PM
and I want to meet and talk to everyone of the idiots on those juries who gave the awards. and go to their homes to rob them and sprain my ankle and get awards of thousands of dollars.....
well I dont actually have the time......... so do they get to keep what they stole too???
but I would LIKE TO......siiiiigh
Love and Light
Swannie

Danustouch
October 23rd, 2001, 02:54 PM
I understand your points, and of course suing people for things that occured in the process of committing a crime, are wrong. I was just kidding about wanting in on it. Geez...lighten up! ;)

Swanspirit
October 23rd, 2001, 03:05 PM
but I still want to talk to those juries they are costing us $$$$$$$$$$$$
&*^&*&*($))(*&^%$@@#@ them.......
Huggles
Swannie

Dagda Moon~Lily
October 23rd, 2001, 07:12 PM
Do you know what I think it is??....I think the jurer's just want to a. be done with the case, or b. drag it out ....they are still getting paid to be there, so why do they care? <shaking head>

I do agree that if you are attempting to commit a crime....it's just tough cookies to you that you'd be bright enough to lock yourself into a garage with a broke Genie, a case of pepsi and a bag of dog food. (I'd make sure I he paid for those too!)

.....and some say Crime doesn't pay! ....looks like it's pretty enticing.....even for the risk involved.


.....AND TRIPPING OVER YOUR OWN CHILD?????????? <okay...this one just annihilates me!>


....going to a neutral corner.....<-----

talamh
October 23rd, 2001, 07:49 PM
Well, i say it says more about the motivation lawyers have when working on commission..... and it is easy to distort the facts of a case. One would really need to know what else was said before being able to really have an informed opinion.

i also think people need to be very careful about falling into the propaganda trap generated by insurance companies. It is in their best interest for the general public to believe that people who sue for damages are scammers and cheats. Insurance company statistics themselves say that between 10 and 15 per cent of claims are false. That means that between 85 per cent and 90 per cent of claims are valid. That's actually a very high rate.

i can't think of one other "service" that a consumer pays for that tries to blame the consumer for trying to make use of the service paid for. Yes, there are some pretty goofy decisions.... but there is also a great deal of suffering and misery caused by insurance companies who treat the claimant as guilty until proven innocent.

If you think you have adequate disability insurance.... i would advise you to read the small print. You just might be shocked and horrified to find out just how much you are paying for how little security. bb talamh

Amora
October 23rd, 2001, 09:02 PM
The moral of these stories appears to be a good lawyer can win you anything!

Just look at OJ!

kittiepoetrygod
October 23rd, 2001, 09:17 PM
I noticed several said jury of peers ... perhaps they might be a teensy biased?

Some of those things are down right ignorant and stupid. Really, suing someone because you tripped over your child in their store ... hello neglect.

Dagda Moon~Lily
October 23rd, 2001, 09:34 PM
Originally posted by Danustouch

4. October 1999: Jerry Williams of Little Rock Arkansas was awarded
$14,500
and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door
neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in it's owner's fenced-in yard,
as was Mr Williams. The award was less than sought after because the jury
felt the dog may have been provoked by Mr. Williams who, at the time, was
shooting it repeatedly with a pellet gun.


Oh and this one.....Cruelty to animals?? Where was the Animal Rights Activists for this case?? How inhuman!!!!

I think someone should do that to him....and see what he would do. (okay...breathing....letting the light back in....) Things like this really burn me!

Sora
October 23rd, 2001, 11:27 PM
Funny. But... sad. Poor doggy :)

amberlaine
October 23rd, 2001, 11:43 PM
Where did you get these tories from? They had me laughing my butt off, but my husband doesn't believe them. I wondered if we could look them up so I could say, "tHere you go, doubting THomas".

bansidhe
October 24th, 2001, 06:40 AM
:rotfl:
my mum juss read these and this is her conclusion:
only in america!!!

take care and brightest blessings,
bans. :bubbles: